A A A
Avatar

Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
it's time
July 16, 2011
3:26 pm
Avatar
solve this
Guest
Guests

I have heard as of one year ago that the police are no closer to solving this crime. It appears that traditional investigative techniques are unfruitful. Hence my thoughts.
This case can be solved by a union between the police and the prosecutors. It is now time to use the subpoena power, sworn testimony, and (if ncessary) immunized testimony. The police have chased down rumors, unsubstantiated hearsay and outright lies. There needs to be a concerted effort to establish the actual facts apart from barroom talk or campfire speculation. This is not an indictment against the police. They simply are up against a cunning quarry that is getting more comfortable as time passes. Through the collaboration of the police and prosecutors, this can be solved. I (and the police) have done this several times. A marriage between the police and the prosecutors can produce evidence from otherwise stonewalled witnesses. Potential witnesses can be given derivative use immunity if necessary. I have learned some techniques over the years and wish I could share it with the authorities in Iowa. However I cannot elaborate any further because the suspect may be monitoring this site.

July 16, 2011
4:32 pm
Avatar
rach
Guest
Guests

That all sounds very fascinating...if you dont want to post your techniues in the forum then you should share that info privately with the investigators who run the site here...there is a "contact" option on the menu bar up top.

July 20, 2011
2:02 am
Avatar
William
Guest
Guests

I doubt there's any secret method here that hasn't been described in the OP.

But, as far as anyone who's been publicly identified as a witness or person of interest, I have to trust in the political ambition of the police department and the county attorney's office. If they thought they had a decent case against anyone in particular, they would have run with it.

At bottom, there's a chicken-or-egg problem with this investigation. Just to explain this point, let's assume she was murdered and that the killer is not Cornseed (the first assumption is pretty solid; there's no way to prove or disprove the latter, right now). Whom to suspect depends on where you find the remains and what you can piece together from the physical evidence. Where to look for remains depends on whom the leading suspects are, and in part, on their psychology and presumed motive.

As a practical matter, if the body turned up, the OP's points are absolutely correct. It just isn't likely to happen when there's not already a genuinely compelling case against anyone in particular.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 401

Currently Online:
17 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 365

Members: 2049

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 469

Posts: 2668