A name would be nice huh.

To start off, let me remind you all that almost all the evidence in this case is circumstantial. Without a body the MCPD doesn't have much of a case. This was proven a few years back with the Evelyn Miller case in which they had the body, and they still didn't have evidence to hold up in a court of law.

Secondly, I want you all to reread the forum rules. The forum admins (who know [i]the name[/i]) are obviously protecting themselves for legal reasons. The name will remain a mystery until there is a testimony in a court of law by the person who heard 'the name' that day in 1995. Even then it's still circumstantial. Who knows how credible it really is? (I myself believe it's very credible).

The question shouldn't be what 'the name' is..it should be who involved in the case is still out there desperate to protect the rights they still have?

There was a time when I thought the name was important.
Now I think the opposite, to me 'the name' has only curiosity value.
After all, investigators have known the name for years and that knowledge hasn't advanced their work on this case one inch.